our 60th report on the ongoing mania since we first published this website
on January 15, 1999.
map of readers from 163 countries can be viewed
Run your mouse over each country!
is now mostly a compilation of articles that have previously appeared in
the Crosscurrents newsletter. Our paid subscription stock market
newsletter has only two rationales for its existence; powerful commentary
and unique perspectives that cannot be found anywhere else.
check out the testimonials on our Kudos
a free sample copy of the Crosscurrents newsletter, CLICK
files of this report are available only to paid subscribers.
are interested, please CLICK
As the most recent months have unfolded,
it has been increasingly clear that our forecasts of a derivative crisis
were both pertinent and correct. We urge you to visit the archives
where many of our past reports were linked in the January
2008 issue of Pictures of A Stock Mania. While the problems appear
to have abated somewhat for the time being, the threats are still in place.
To date, financial companies have lost or written off more than $300 billion.
If our previous analysis is correct, we may be only a fraction of the way
towards an eventual resolution and reversal. Stay tuned. In
the meantime, the sheer velocity of stock trading implies we are in a terminal
stage for paper assets.
As far back as one year ago, so-called "Dark Pools"
accounted for 17% of New York Stock Exchange market share. The pools
seek to reduce the costs of trading for clients by crossing orders in their
proprietary books, without publishing the quotes. Theoretically,
pricing is improved and the proprietors earn higher commissions.
Supposedly, a win win scenario. However, all we see is the further
Frankenstein-ization of the U.S. stock market, another step in opacity
and yet another market mechanism that draws assets from investment mode
to trading mode. When monies are "invested" as opposed to "traded,"
valuations are of primary importance. When monies are "traded" rather
than invested, short term considerations are paramount. Benjamin
Graham and David Dodd literally wrote the book on security analysis (see
Their principals enabled investors to determine a fair value for securities
for decades, but the practice has been rapidly losing adherents since the
mania first drew its first breath of life in 1995.
As trading has proliferated, the velocity of dollar
volume has expanded so significantly that it dwarfs any comparisons to
the past. Another new record was established in 2007 and at the pace
of the first three months in 2008, yet another new record will be established
this year, far exceeding 2007. Relative to the country's gross domestic
product, trading velocity is now three times the pace of 1929. Interestingly,
the stock market is no longer just a market of stocks; it is a market ruled
by derivatives of the securities that make the market possible in the first
place. The tail completely wags the dog. Bear
in mind that the statistics shown in our charts do not include stock options,
which generate additional trading on their own specific requirements for
hedging by options market makers. Clearly, the long and short side
of options are taken almost exclusively by traders, not investors.
These wasting "assets" are based on ephemeral valuations, here one moment
and gone the next. More than 95% of options will expire worthless,
as their principal valuation is based on time, most often less than one
For those who could only shrug their shoulders
from a distance at Nasdaq's 200 price-earnings multiple at the end of 1999,
it was patently clear that the biggest mania since the Roaring Twenties
was in full swing. Yet the stock market was still ten weeks from
one of the greatest and most significant tops in history as Nasdaq incredibly
surged to 250 times earnings. By the end of 1999, dollar trading
volume was over $20 trillion, double what it was two years previously,
and more than double the country's gross domestic product. At the
current pace, DTV will be two-and-half times what it was at the end of
1999 and will have doubled yet again in relation to GDP. Think about
it. Despite a horrifying bear market that witnessed 50% of values
wiped out between March 2000 and October 2002, the pace of trading has
nevertheless expanded by an average annualized 15.4% per year for the last
decade. Since the 2002 bottom, the pace of growth is over 20% annualized.
Total Dollar Trading Volume
is running at a rate of $55.5 trillion.
Can there be any possible reason
to expect the pace of growth to be sustainable?
The advent of trading in single-stock
futures will mean even more money devoted to trading.
Where, in this picture, are
When we compare Dollar Trading Volume to total stock
market capitalization, we see a picture equally bizarre; a spectacle so
far surpassing the 1929 manic peak that we can only wonder where (and when)
it all ends. For our part, we are convinced it cannot end well.
In our last report, we wrote, "From 1932 through 1996, a period of 65 years,
DTV never exceeded 100% of market capitalization. During those years,
average DTV to market cap was only 34.6%."
However, since 1999, average DTV to market
cap has been more than seven times higher at 255%.
DTV to market cap is currently
running at a clip of 330%.
Investors make up a smaller
share of volume as trading increases.
In the process, valuations
become increasingly unimportant.
Clearly, the current period
parallels the prior manias of both 1929 and 2000.
It would not be unreasonable
to expect a return to the peak levels of 2000.
At the very least, we should
expect a return to the peak level of 1929.
Either circumstance should
mean a severe bear market to come.
The following article is reprinted
from the January 28, 2008 issue of Crosscurrents.
Although gold bullion has
corrected considerably from the March 17th peak of $1011 per ounce,
we correctly pegged resistance
and the subsequent pullback.
The charts below have not been
updated and will not correspond precisely with today's prices.
We cover the gold market with
updated charts for Crosscurrents subscribers roughly 3-4 times per year.
"The Gold Bull Market Still
On January 15th, we issued a Special Update, closing
out 5% of our Trading Stance idea in Newmont Mining (NEM) only $0.30 from
the high closing price, and moving the other 5% to the Investment Stance,
a move we had initially indicated might occur when the idea was first presented
back in June 2007. There were two reasons behind our action.
First, the idea was already closing in on eight month's duration and was
no longer suitable as a “trade” per se. Secondly and more importantly,
gold stocks had run considerably with the move in bullion, and as today’s
charts clearly illustrate, a fair amount of resistance was likely at hand.
These charts have been shown numerous times in Crosscurrents and each time
we cited the inflation-adjusted December 1987 peak as having the potential
for strong resistance (see featured chart at center). By January
15th, we were close enough to take a conservative view and alter our precious
metals allocations. Incidentally, although prices for the Dow and
Gold have shifted somewhat, today’s charts are as of our Special Update,
in order to show the perspectives in force at that time. As of today,
NEM represents one-quarter of our total long allocation of 60% in the Investment
Stance, a very significant concentration and entirely sufficient for the
time being, despite our very bullish views for gold over the long term.
Our charts indicate there should be ample room on the upside at a later
date for new positions if we are correct. With an eventual target
well above $1800 per ounce, we would expect Newmont to remain a terrific
choice for the Investment Stance. That said, we are NOT buyers of
any gold issues at present levels.
Our next chart shows paper assets bottomed in relation
to gold in 1980 and then peaked in near total concert with Nasdaq’s manic
run into March 2000. Despite the dramatic contraction in the Dow/Gold
Ratio since, there is still insufficient recognition that the world is
changing far too rapidly for the status quo (paper). While it may
take many years for the impact of China’s rapid growth to be visible everywhere,
it will nevertheless occur. India will follow shortly thereafter.
We cannot possibly ignore the potential impact 37% of the planet’s population
are likely to have as they move well into the 21st century. While
this impact grows in significance, uncertainties will continue to build
about the U.S. dollar, the world’s reserve currency for decades.
We do not expect the dollar or the U.S. to go “out of business” and we
do not expect the kind of decline of American civilization that some have
forecast. On the contrary, a generation away, there is high potential
for a golden age for mankind, with America’s population continuing to contribute
more than its share to progress in commerce and prosperity. However,
gold is our barometer of uncertainty and it is patently obvious that too
many questions about the future remain unanswered.
We first forecast resistance coinciding with the
inflation adjusted peak of December 1987 at least four years ago and possibly
even further back (see http://www.cross-currents.net/archives/jan03.htm).
Note that resistance levels have changed along with inflation. In
the June 25, 2007 of Crosscurrents, resistance had moved to $873.
At current prices, we believe gold has sufficiently discounted the uncertainties
visible in world markets today. Thus, we see ample reason for this
resistance to exert a modicum of pressure for several months. Our
next resistance level just above $1000 per ounce now seems a high odds
probability. We have no particular time frame in mind but if world
markets behave as we expect into the end of the year, the $1000 mark could
be threatened before 2009 arrives.
It is utterly baffling that gold’s super bull market
is not more widely followed by the financial media. We understand
that listed companies that advertise pay the bills, nevertheless, there
should be room for coverage of this important story. Gold has been
a storehouse of value for thousands of years. Companies (read stocks)
are born, they live and they die. Gold as an asset remains constant.
Bear in mind that our chart at right below was created as of January 15th,
with the Dow at 12,501 and gold at $907.40. We show the Dow up 39%
from the bear market low. Even at the October highs, the stock bull
market had only gained 45% adjusted for inflation.
Compared to stocks, the bull
market in gold has been far more robust.
Gold bullion is up 115% adjusted
for inflation from when stocks bottomed in October 2002.
In our view, the odds favor
gold to continue in bull mode
for years to come.
The following article is reprinted
from the March 31, 2008 issue of Crosscurrents.
The charts have not been updated.
"Too Little Cash, Too Much
By the end of March 2000, the cash-to-assets ratio
of mutual funds had run to a near record low and was only 4%. As
the previous record low of 3.9% in January 1973 conclusively proved, if
cash reserves dwindle dramatically, there is good reason to believe that
potential buying power is at best, minimal. Fact of life: when buying
dries up, selling takes over. In the 1973-1974 bear market, stock
prices fell by 45%. After the March 2000 peak, stock prices fell
by 50%. Amazingly, the lesson was not learned and by the end of July
2007, the cash-to-assets ratio contracted to a new all time low of 3.5%.
Prices peaked three months later and collapsed by nearly 20% basis the
S&P. Incredibly, the cash-to-assets ratio has not moved up all
that much and stands at 4.1%. In the past, this level would have
marked extreme optimism. We can probably dismiss overt optimism at
this juncture but clearly, the still quite low level of cash reserves spells
Only eight months after the March 2000 peak, the
S&P 500 had fallen by 12.3% and the cash-to-assets ratio had expanded
to 6.5%. Total cash on hand rose 40% from $179 billion to $249 billion,
yet the hole in the dike remained wide open. How did the bear market
end? It took close to another two years and continual buying by mutual
funds to stem the tide. By the October 2002 bottom, nearly half the
cash on hand had disappeared. By the confirmed bottom of March 2003,
total cash on hand contracted by another 20%.
However, although total cash on hand appears fairly
robust at $246 billion today, the cash-to-assets ratio compares unfavorably
with the 5.1% registered at the October 2002 bottom. The same ratio
today would equate to another $60 billion in potential buying power and
frankly, the only circumstance that will bring the bull back into the arena
is vastly more liquidity than we see today. As our chart clearly
illustrates, the cash-to-assets ratio is only a tick above the low reading
of March 2000. The ratio is way too low. As you
read on, we will explain why we do not expect the cash ratio to expand
as it has in past generations, but it can certainly expand to 5% or even
6% on the way to a secular bear market bottom. If true, we are far
from a long term turn.
Check out the next chart. While there has
been a dramatic collapse in the rate of inflows, it was a lot worse in
the previous bear market. Outflows did not even peak until July 2002,
more than two years after prices peaked. For a period of 26 months,
mutual funds suffered net outflows. A similar outcome would place
the current bear market bottom somewhere out in the spring of 2010.
Given the nexus of too little cash and too much debt, own forecast calls
for a longer downturn before sufficient liquidity returns to drive prices
The offset is that for the intermediate term of
several months ahead, the market has been thoroughly sold out. A
corrective reversal to the upside, albeit not a return of the bull market,
is due. April has traditionally been a robust month for net inflows
into mutual funds and we expect this year to reflect the same rationale
for investment as in the past; the period for IRA contributions ends on
April 15th. This has been an important driver for April inflows and
we see no reason to expect a change in 2008. The last April that
suffered net outflows was twenty years ago, in 1988. We expect
April’s inflows to be sufficient to sustain a reversal.
The size and duration of the reversal remains in
doubt. As the chart below painfully illustrates, margin debt is still
extremely high, having pulled back only 12.2% from the July ‘07 peak of
$416.4 billion. The lower low registered in December is a technical
indication suggesting further weakness and frankly, the fundamentals demand
a much broader drawdown. Margin debt annualized differential implies
a repeat of the 2000-2002 cycle which required a 40% annualized drawdown
in margin debt. A similar occurrence would equate to $146 billion
in outflows and we believe this to be a conservative estimate.
It took 30 months for the drawdown to conclude
after the manic peak
and a drawdown in margin debt of equivalent
duration would point to January 2010
for another major bottom to be put into
Given the extent of the bubble
echo and the damage done to the financial markets,
it will likely require at
least three additional years to rebuild liquidity
before the secular bear passes
As in 2000, the picture strongly
suggests traders and speculators are ruling the roost.
Q: Where are the investors?
Speculation still reigns.
For the last few years, we have often focused on
annualized returns for the Dow Industrials over ten year rolling periods
since 1907. We emphatically forecasted on many occasions that annualized
returns for ten-year rolling periods would decline dramatically and clearly,
The week of September 8, 2000, 10-year returns
reached an all time high of 16.14%.
By the week ended March 14, 2008, 10-year
returns had plunged all the way to 2.98%!
And now that 10-year returns are in the normal
range that history has shown to be sustainable,
it is time for 20-year annualized
returns to fall to normal ranges.
Despite the common wisdom that stocks grow 10%
per year, they have not. Despite the experience of investors during
the great bull market from 1982 to 2000, stocks are quite likely to imitate
the past. As of this report, annualized returns for the last 20 years
are still 9.97%, well above the historic average annualized return of 4.9%
(ex-dividends) that history has shown to be normal. Since this indicator
is below 5% more often than it is not, our expectations for a return to
the normal range is entirely reasonable.
Incredibly, if the Dow Industrials
just trade sideways from here,
the historical average annualized
return of 4.9%
for all 20-year rolling periods
will not be achieved....
(are you sitting down?)
....until late October 2015.
We see no reason to doubt
a return to what history has shown
to be the norms of the last
In fact, if the Dow touches
the 5% line five years from today,
it will trade at 9300, 29%
lower than today.
Should we doubt the possibility
of these outcomes?
The 1929 Dow high was not exceeded
The 1966 Dow high was not
substantially exceeded until 1982.
The 2000 SPX high has still
not been substantially exceeded.
Investors have been chased
from the market.
Speculation rules. Valuations
The Crosscurrents newsletter has covered the
phenomenal growth of Exchange Traded Funds in detail for the last few years.
ETFs now comprise 3.4% of all stock assets yet account for roughly one-quarter
of stock dollar trading volume. Holding periods are ridiculously
short, a strong indication that valuations of the underlying constituent
issues are inconsequential. The S&P Spyders alone are trading
at a pace that will likely equal one of every $7 traded for U.S. stocks!
The entire capitalization of the Spyders will turn over 124 times this
year, an average holding period of only two days. Our question:
Where are the investors?
For the remainder of 2008,
we are actually more sanguine about the intermediate term prospects for
stocks than this article might imply. Our views above are longer term
in nature. Crosscurrents subscribers are well aware of our up
to date forecasts and as you can see for yourself immediately below, we
are still looking for the annual highs later this year. Currently,
upside and downside odds are roughly the same and it appears likely that
volatility will subside still further in the months ahead. To see
a free sample copy of the Crosscurrents newsletter,CLICK
High Targets for
13,685 /// SPX 1505 /// Nasdaq Composite 2670
still likely to occur late in the year
Our Low Targets
for 2008 were achieved but are STILL viable targets!
11,900 /// SPX 1310 /// Nasdaq Composite 2300
correction we previously forecast has occurred.
OF THE ENTIRE WEBSITE ARE COPYRIGHT 2008 CROSSCURRENTS PUBLICATIONS, LLC
I hope you have enjoyed your visit and please return
again. If you know anyone who might be interested in seeing what
we have to offer, we'd be happy to have them visit as well!
Alan M. Newman, May 4, 2008
CLICK ICON TO GO BACK TO ARCHIVE
All information on this website is
prepared from data obtained from sources believed reliable, but not guaranteed
by us, and is not considered to be all inclusive. Any stocks, sectors
or indexes mentioned on this page are not to be construed as buy, sell,
hold or short recommendations. This report is for informational and
entertainment purposes only. Persons affiliated with Crosscurrents
Publications, LLC may be long or short the securities or related options
or other derivative securities mentioned in this report. Our perspectives
are subject to change without notice. We assume no responsibility
or liability for the information contained in this report. No investment
or trading advice whatsoever is implied by our commentary, coverage or